Chile vs Mauritius: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Chile
33.7%
in 2019
Mauritius
34.5%
in 2019
Chile rank
17th
Mauritius rank
16th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Chile
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 34.5% against 33.7% in Chile, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 17th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 193 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.6% | 7.8% | 1.8% | Chile |
| 2000s | 17.9% | 11.9% | 6.0% | Chile |
| 2010s | 29.5% | 25.2% | 4.4% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Chile or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 34.5% against 33.7% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Chile and Mauritius?
- 0.8%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Chile ranks 17th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.