Canada vs Mus: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled) … 30-79
Canada
60.7%
in 2019
Mus
34.5%
in 2019
Canada rank
1st
Mus rank
1st
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled) … 30-79 over time
- Canada
- Mus
How they compare
Canada currently reports 60.7% against 34.5% in Mus, a difference of 26.2%.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.8 times Mus's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 1st and Mus ranks 1st of 193 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Mus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.6% | 7.8% | 10.8% | Canada |
| 2000s | 44.3% | 11.9% | 32.4% | Canada |
| 2010s | 60.0% | 25.2% | 34.8% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Canada or Mus?
- Canada, at 60.7% against 34.5% in Mus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Canada and Mus?
- 26.2%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mus?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Mus rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Canada ranks 1st and Mus ranks 1st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.