Brazil vs Chile: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Brazil
33.3%
in 2019
Chile
33.7%
in 2019
Brazil rank
19th
Chile rank
17th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Brazil
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 33.7% against 33.3% in Brazil, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 19th and Chile ranks 17th of 193 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.9% | 9.6% | 1.7% | Chile |
| 2000s | 15.8% | 17.9% | 2.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 28.0% | 29.5% | 1.5% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Brazil or Chile?
- Chile, at 33.7% against 33.3% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Brazil and Chile?
- 0.4%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chile?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Chile rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Brazil ranks 19th and Chile ranks 17th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.