Botswana vs Grenada: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Botswana
18.8%
in 2019
Grenada
19.0%
in 2019
Botswana rank
93rd
Grenada rank
91st
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Botswana
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 19.0% against 18.8% in Botswana, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 93rd and Grenada ranks 91st of 193 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.1% | 6.6% | 2.4% | Grenada |
| 2000s | 7.9% | 11.9% | 4.0% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 14.9% | 17.5% | 2.6% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Botswana or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 19.0% against 18.8% in Botswana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Botswana and Grenada?
- 0.2%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Grenada?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Grenada rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Botswana ranks 93rd and Grenada ranks 91st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.