Belgium vs El Salvador: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Belgium
37.9%
in 2019
El Salvador
39.4%
in 2019
Belgium rank
10th
El Salvador rank
9th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Belgium
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 39.4% against 37.9% in Belgium, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.
Belgium ranks 10th and El Salvador ranks 9th of 193 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.4% | 14.0% | 0.4% | Belgium |
| 2000s | 26.9% | 23.3% | 3.6% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 36.2% | 35.5% | 0.7% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Belgium or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 39.4% against 37.9% in Belgium as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Belgium and El Salvador?
- 1.5%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and El Salvador?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and El Salvador rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Belgium ranks 10th and El Salvador ranks 9th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.