Belarus vs Malawi: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Belarus
10.2%
in 2019
Malawi
10.9%
in 2019
Belarus rank
151st
Malawi rank
150th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Belarus
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 10.9% against 10.2% in Belarus, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 151st and Malawi ranks 150th of 193 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.3% | 1.4% | 1.9% | Belarus |
| 2000s | 6.7% | 2.3% | 4.4% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 9.4% | 6.7% | 2.7% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Belarus or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 10.9% against 10.2% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Belarus and Malawi?
- 0.7%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malawi?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Malawi rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Belarus ranks 151st and Malawi ranks 150th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.