Bahamas vs Hungary: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Bahamas
22.4%
in 2019
Hungary
22.6%
in 2019
Bahamas rank
69th
Hungary rank
67th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Bahamas
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 22.6% against 22.4% in Bahamas, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 69th and Hungary ranks 67th of 193 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8% | 5.7% | 2.2% | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 14.5% | 11.2% | 3.3% | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 20.9% | 19.0% | 1.9% | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Bahamas or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 22.6% against 22.4% in Bahamas as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Bahamas and Hungary?
- 0.2%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Hungary?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and Hungary rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Bahamas ranks 69th and Hungary ranks 67th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.