Saint Lucia vs Sweden: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Saint Lucia
22.2%
in 2019
Sweden
21.8%
in 2019
Saint Lucia rank
68th
Sweden rank
71st
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Saint Lucia
- Sweden
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 22.2% against 21.8% in Sweden, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Saint Lucia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 71st of 193 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.7% | 4.2% | 3.6% | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 14.4% | 9.3% | 5.1% | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 20.7% | 18.1% | 2.7% | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Saint Lucia or Sweden?
- Saint Lucia, at 22.2% against 21.8% in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Saint Lucia and Sweden?
- 0.4%, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Sweden?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Saint Lucia and Sweden rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Saint Lucia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 71st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.