Sri Lanka vs Uzbekistan: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Sri Lanka
16.1%
in 2019
Uzbekistan
17.0%
in 2019
Sri Lanka rank
102nd
Uzbekistan rank
100th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 17.0% against 16.1% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 102nd and Uzbekistan ranks 100th of 193 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.7% | 8.8% | 4.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 8.9% | 14.5% | 5.6% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 13.9% | 16.7% | 2.9% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Sri Lanka or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 17.0% against 16.1% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan?
- 0.9%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 102nd and Uzbekistan ranks 100th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.