Philippines vs Sri Lanka: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Philippines
16.5%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
16.1%
in 2019
Philippines rank
101st
Sri Lanka rank
102nd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Philippines
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 16.5% against 16.1% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Philippines ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 102nd of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.1% | 4.7% | 0.6% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 7.9% | 8.9% | 1.0% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 14.0% | 13.9% | 0.2% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Philippines or Sri Lanka?
- Philippines, at 16.5% against 16.1% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Philippines and Sri Lanka?
- 0.4%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Sri Lanka rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Philippines ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 102nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.