Peru vs South Africa: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Peru
21.6%
in 2019
South Africa
22.0%
in 2019
Peru rank
72nd
South Africa rank
70th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 22.0% against 21.6% in Peru, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 72nd and South Africa ranks 70th of 193 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.6% | 5.5% | 1.1% | Peru |
| 2000s | 13.1% | 10.8% | 2.3% | Peru |
| 2010s | 21.4% | 18.4% | 3.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 22.0% against 21.6% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.4%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Peru ranks 72nd and South Africa ranks 70th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.