Palau vs Zimbabwe: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Palau
14.6%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
15.3%
in 2019
Palau rank
111th
Zimbabwe rank
108th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Palau
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 15.3% against 14.6% in Palau, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Palau ahead.
Palau ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Palau averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.8% | 4.0% | 1.8% | Palau |
| 2000s | 7.3% | 7.2% | 0.2% | Palau |
| 2010s | 11.5% | 12.4% | 0.9% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Palau or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 15.3% against 14.6% in Palau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Palau and Zimbabwe?
- 0.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Palau and Zimbabwe rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Palau ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.