Norway vs Romania: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Norway
29.5%
in 2019
Romania
29.3%
in 2019
Norway rank
40th
Romania rank
41st
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Norway
- Romania
How they compare
Norway currently reports 29.5% against 29.3% in Romania, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Norway ranks 40th and Romania ranks 41st of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.9% | 6.7% | 1.8% | Romania |
| 2000s | 14.4% | 13.5% | 0.9% | Norway |
| 2010s | 25.9% | 24.0% | 1.8% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Norway or Romania?
- Norway, at 29.5% against 29.3% in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Norway and Romania?
- 0.2%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Romania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Norway and Romania rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Norway ranks 40th and Romania ranks 41st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.