Nicaragua vs Poland: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Nicaragua
34.1%
in 2019
Poland
34.1%
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
19th
Poland rank
19th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Nicaragua
- Poland
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 34.1% against 34.1% in Poland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 19th and Poland ranks 19th of 193 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.1% | 6.3% | 4.9% | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 18.3% | 14.0% | 4.3% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 29.7% | 27.5% | 2.2% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Nicaragua or Poland?
- Nicaragua, at 34.1% against 34.1% in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Nicaragua and Poland?
- 0.0%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Poland?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Poland rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Nicaragua ranks 19th and Poland ranks 19th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.