New Zealand vs Uruguay: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
New Zealand
30.1%
in 2019
Uruguay
30.5%
in 2019
New Zealand rank
35th
Uruguay rank
33rd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- New Zealand
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 30.5% against 30.1% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 33rd of 193 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.9% | 8.7% | 2.2% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 21.7% | 16.6% | 5.1% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 29.6% | 26.8% | 2.9% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), New Zealand or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 30.5% against 30.1% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 0.4%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- New Zealand ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 33rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.