Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Myanmar
14.9%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
15.3%
in 2019
Myanmar rank
110th
Zimbabwe rank
108th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Myanmar
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 15.3% against 14.9% in Myanmar, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 193 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.4% | 4.0% | 0.4% | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 8.0% | 7.2% | 0.8% | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 13.0% | 12.4% | 0.6% | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 15.3% against 14.9% in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
- 0.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Myanmar ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.