Mauritius vs Slovakia: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Mauritius
35.4%
in 2019
Slovakia
36.1%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
16th
Slovakia rank
14th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Mauritius
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 36.1% against 35.4% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 16th and Slovakia ranks 14th of 193 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8% | 9.0% | 1.2% | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 11.7% | 18.4% | 6.7% | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 30.9% | 5.3% | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Mauritius or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 36.1% against 35.4% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Mauritius and Slovakia?
- 0.7%, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovakia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Slovakia rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Mauritius ranks 16th and Slovakia ranks 14th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.