Mauritius vs SEAR: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Mauritius
35.4%
in 2019
SEAR
13.3%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
16th
SEAR rank
13th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Mauritius
- SEAR
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 35.4% against 13.3% in SEAR, a difference of 22.1%.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 2.7 times SEAR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 16th and SEAR ranks 13th of 193 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8% | 2.6% | 5.2% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 11.7% | 5.7% | 6.1% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 10.7% | 14.9% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Mauritius or SEAR?
- Mauritius, at 35.4% against 13.3% in SEAR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Mauritius and SEAR?
- 22.1%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and SEAR?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and SEAR rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Mauritius ranks 16th and SEAR ranks 13th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.