Mauritius vs Nicaragua: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Mauritius
35.4%
in 2019
Nicaragua
34.1%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
16th
Nicaragua rank
19th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Mauritius
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 35.4% against 34.1% in Nicaragua, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Mauritius ranks 16th and Nicaragua ranks 19th of 193 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8% | 11.1% | 3.4% | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 11.7% | 18.3% | 6.6% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 25.6% | 29.7% | 4.2% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Mauritius or Nicaragua?
- Mauritius, at 35.4% against 34.1% in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Mauritius and Nicaragua?
- 1.3%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nicaragua?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Nicaragua rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Mauritius ranks 16th and Nicaragua ranks 19th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.