Malta vs WPR: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Malta
47.2%
in 2019
WPR
19.0%
in 2019
Malta rank
8th
WPR rank
7th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Malta
- WPR
How they compare
Malta currently reports 47.2% against 19.0% in WPR, a difference of 28.2%.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.5 times WPR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 8th and WPR ranks 7th of 193 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | WPR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.4% | 4.6% | 8.9% | Malta |
| 2000s | 25.6% | 9.7% | 15.9% | Malta |
| 2010s | 42.0% | 16.7% | 25.3% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Malta or WPR?
- Malta, at 47.2% against 19.0% in WPR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Malta and WPR?
- 28.2%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and WPR?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malta and WPR rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Malta ranks 8th and WPR ranks 7th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.