Malaysia vs Niue: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Malaysia
18.7%
in 2019
Niue
19.2%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
86th
Niue rank
84th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Malaysia
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 19.2% against 18.7% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 86th and Niue ranks 84th of 193 countries.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.5% | 9.5% | 4.0% | Niue |
| 2000s | 9.7% | 13.5% | 3.8% | Niue |
| 2010s | 16.1% | 17.6% | 1.5% | Niue |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Malaysia or Niue?
- Niue, at 19.2% against 18.7% in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Malaysia and Niue?
- 0.5%, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Niue?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Niue rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Malaysia ranks 86th and Niue ranks 84th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.