Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Malawi
9.3%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
9.9%
in 2019
Malawi rank
156th
Papua New Guinea rank
153rd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Malawi
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 9.9% against 9.3% in Malawi, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 156th and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 193 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.4% | 4.5% | 3.1% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 2.1% | 5.8% | 3.6% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 5.8% | 8.2% | 2.4% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Malawi or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 9.9% against 9.3% in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.6%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Papua New Guinea rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Malawi ranks 156th and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.