Lithuania vs Naoero: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Lithuania
13.9%
in 2019
Naoero
14.2%
in 2019
Lithuania rank
120th
Naoero rank
117th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Lithuania
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 14.2% against 13.9% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 120th and Naoero ranks 117th of 193 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.2% | 8.0% | 5.8% | Naoero |
| 2000s | 6.2% | 10.0% | 3.8% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 11.3% | 12.7% | 1.4% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Lithuania or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 14.2% against 13.9% in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Lithuania and Naoero?
- 0.3%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Naoero?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Naoero rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Lithuania ranks 120th and Naoero ranks 117th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.