Libya vs Malawi: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Libya
9.8%
in 2019
Malawi
9.3%
in 2019
Libya rank
154th
Malawi rank
156th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Libya
- Malawi
How they compare
Libya currently reports 9.8% against 9.3% in Malawi, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 154th and Malawi ranks 156th of 193 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.2% | 1.4% | 0.9% | Libya |
| 2000s | 3.7% | 2.1% | 1.6% | Libya |
| 2010s | 7.8% | 5.8% | 2.0% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Libya or Malawi?
- Libya, at 9.8% against 9.3% in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Libya and Malawi?
- 0.5%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malawi?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Malawi rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Libya ranks 154th and Malawi ranks 156th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.