Latvia vs Malaysia: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Latvia
18.4%
in 2019
Malaysia
18.7%
in 2019
Latvia rank
88th
Malaysia rank
86th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Latvia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 18.7% against 18.4% in Latvia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Latvia ranks 88th and Malaysia ranks 86th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.4% | 5.5% | 1.1% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 9.7% | 9.7% | 0.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 15.6% | 16.1% | 0.5% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Latvia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 18.7% against 18.4% in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Latvia and Malaysia?
- 0.3%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malaysia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Malaysia rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Latvia ranks 88th and Malaysia ranks 86th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.