Republic of Korea vs Sur: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Republic of Korea
55.4%
in 2019
Sur
21.0%
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
2nd
Sur rank
2nd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Republic of Korea
- Sur
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 55.4% against 21.0% in Sur, a difference of 34.4%.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 2.6 times Sur's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sur ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.4% | 7.2% | 0.2% | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 25.2% | 13.3% | 11.9% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 48.4% | 19.4% | 29.0% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Republic of Korea or Sur?
- Republic of Korea, at 55.4% against 21.0% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Republic of Korea and Sur?
- 34.4%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Sur rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Republic of Korea ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.