Kiribati vs Solomon Islands: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Kiribati
6.3%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
6.4%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
184th
Solomon Islands rank
183rd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Kiribati
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 6.4% against 6.3% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 184th and Solomon Islands ranks 183rd of 193 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.8% | 3.0% | 2.7% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 7.0% | 3.6% | 3.4% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 5.1% | 1.6% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Kiribati or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 6.4% against 6.3% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 0.1%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Solomon Islands rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Kiribati ranks 184th and Solomon Islands ranks 183rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.