Kiribati vs Madagascar: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Kiribati
6.3%
in 2019
Madagascar
5.9%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
184th
Madagascar rank
186th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Kiribati
- Madagascar
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 6.3% against 5.9% in Madagascar, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 184th and Madagascar ranks 186th of 193 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.8% | 0.9% | 4.9% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 7.0% | 1.3% | 5.7% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 3.6% | 3.1% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Kiribati or Madagascar?
- Kiribati, at 6.3% against 5.9% in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Kiribati and Madagascar?
- 0.4%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Madagascar?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Madagascar rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Kiribati ranks 184th and Madagascar ranks 186th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.