Jordan vs New Zealand: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Jordan
29.9%
in 2019
New Zealand
30.1%
in 2019
Jordan rank
37th
New Zealand rank
35th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Jordan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 30.1% against 29.9% in Jordan, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 37th and New Zealand ranks 35th of 193 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.1% | 10.9% | 2.8% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 14.8% | 21.7% | 6.9% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 26.3% | 29.6% | 3.3% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Jordan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 30.1% against 29.9% in Jordan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Jordan and New Zealand?
- 0.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and New Zealand rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Jordan ranks 37th and New Zealand ranks 35th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.