Jamaica vs Namibia: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Jamaica
19.3%
in 2019
Namibia
19.7%
in 2019
Jamaica rank
82nd
Namibia rank
80th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Jamaica
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 19.7% against 19.3% in Jamaica, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 82nd and Namibia ranks 80th of 193 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.9% | 4.8% | 3.1% | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 14.1% | 8.9% | 5.1% | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 18.6% | 16.1% | 2.5% | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Jamaica or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 19.7% against 19.3% in Jamaica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Jamaica and Namibia?
- 0.4%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Namibia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Namibia rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Jamaica ranks 82nd and Namibia ranks 80th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.