Italy vs New Zealand: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Italy
29.8%
in 2019
New Zealand
30.1%
in 2019
Italy rank
38th
New Zealand rank
35th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Italy
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 30.1% against 29.8% in Italy, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 38th and New Zealand ranks 35th of 193 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.8% | 10.9% | 6.2% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 13.6% | 21.7% | 8.1% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 26.3% | 29.6% | 3.4% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Italy or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 30.1% against 29.8% in Italy as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Italy and New Zealand?
- 0.3%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Italy and New Zealand rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Italy ranks 38th and New Zealand ranks 35th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.