Iceland vs Republic of Korea: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Iceland
52.6%
in 2019
Republic of Korea
55.4%
in 2019
Iceland rank
3rd
Republic of Korea rank
2nd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Iceland
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 55.4% against 52.6% in Iceland, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 3rd and Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.9% | 7.4% | 7.5% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 31.8% | 25.2% | 6.6% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 48.5% | 48.4% | 0.1% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Iceland or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 55.4% against 52.6% in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Iceland and Republic of Korea?
- 2.8%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Republic of Korea?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Republic of Korea rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Iceland ranks 3rd and Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.