Guyana vs Namibia: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Guyana
20.3%
in 2019
Namibia
19.7%
in 2019
Guyana rank
79th
Namibia rank
80th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Guyana
- Namibia
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 20.3% against 19.7% in Namibia, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 79th and Namibia ranks 80th of 193 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.5% | 4.8% | 2.7% | Guyana |
| 2000s | 13.5% | 8.9% | 4.6% | Guyana |
| 2010s | 19.1% | 16.1% | 3.0% | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Guyana or Namibia?
- Guyana, at 20.3% against 19.7% in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Guyana and Namibia?
- 0.6%, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Namibia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and Namibia rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Guyana ranks 79th and Namibia ranks 80th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.