Grenada vs Namibia: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Grenada
19.4%
in 2019
Namibia
19.7%
in 2019
Grenada rank
81st
Namibia rank
80th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Grenada
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 19.7% against 19.4% in Grenada, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 80th of 193 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.5% | 4.8% | 1.7% | Grenada |
| 2000s | 11.9% | 8.9% | 3.0% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 17.8% | 16.1% | 1.7% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Grenada or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 19.7% against 19.4% in Grenada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Grenada and Namibia?
- 0.3%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Namibia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Namibia rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Grenada ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 80th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.