Finland vs Jordan: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Finland
30.3%
in 2019
Jordan
29.9%
in 2019
Finland rank
34th
Jordan rank
37th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Finland
- Jordan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 30.3% against 29.9% in Jordan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Jordan ahead.
Finland ranks 34th and Jordan ranks 37th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.0% | 8.1% | 1.1% | Jordan |
| 2000s | 18.4% | 14.8% | 3.6% | Finland |
| 2010s | 28.6% | 26.3% | 2.2% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Finland or Jordan?
- Finland, at 30.3% against 29.9% in Jordan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Finland and Jordan?
- 0.4%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Jordan?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Jordan rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Finland ranks 34th and Jordan ranks 37th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.