Finland vs Japan: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Finland
30.3%
in 2019
Japan
31.7%
in 2019
Finland rank
34th
Japan rank
31st
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Finland
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 31.7% against 30.3% in Finland, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Finland ranks 34th and Japan ranks 31st of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.0% | 7.4% | 0.4% | Japan |
| 2000s | 18.4% | 15.6% | 2.8% | Finland |
| 2010s | 28.6% | 27.3% | 1.2% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Finland or Japan?
- Japan, at 31.7% against 30.3% in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Finland and Japan?
- 1.4%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Japan?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Japan rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Finland ranks 34th and Japan ranks 31st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.