Estonia vs Philippines: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Estonia
16.1%
in 2019
Philippines
16.5%
in 2019
Estonia rank
102nd
Philippines rank
101st
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Estonia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 16.5% against 16.1% in Estonia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Philippines ahead.
Estonia ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 101st of 193 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.7% | 4.1% | 0.6% | Estonia |
| 2000s | 9.5% | 7.9% | 1.6% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 14.1% | 14.0% | 0.1% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Estonia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 16.5% against 16.1% in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Estonia and Philippines?
- 0.4%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Philippines?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Philippines rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Estonia ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 101st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.