EMR vs Malta: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
EMR
14.7%
in 2019
Malta
47.2%
in 2019
EMR rank
10th
Malta rank
8th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- EMR
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 47.2% against 14.7% in EMR, a difference of 32.5%.
That makes Malta's figure about 3.2 times EMR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
EMR ranks 10th and Malta ranks 8th of 17 groups.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | EMR | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.9% | 13.4% | 8.6% | Malta |
| 2000s | 8.2% | 25.6% | 17.4% | Malta |
| 2010s | 13.2% | 42.0% | 28.8% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), EMR or Malta?
- Malta, at 47.2% against 14.7% in EMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between EMR and Malta?
- 32.5%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for EMR and Malta?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do EMR and Malta rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- EMR ranks 10th and Malta ranks 8th of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.