El Salvador vs SEAR: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
El Salvador
39.5%
in 2019
SEAR
13.3%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
10th
SEAR rank
13th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- El Salvador
- SEAR
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 39.5% against 13.3% in SEAR, a difference of 26.2%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 3.0 times SEAR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 10th and SEAR ranks 13th of 193 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.1% | 2.6% | 11.5% | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 23.2% | 5.7% | 17.6% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 35.4% | 10.7% | 24.7% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), El Salvador or SEAR?
- El Salvador, at 39.5% against 13.3% in SEAR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between El Salvador and SEAR?
- 26.2%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and SEAR?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and SEAR rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- El Salvador ranks 10th and SEAR ranks 13th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.