El Salvador vs Malta: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
El Salvador
39.5%
in 2019
Malta
47.2%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
10th
Malta rank
8th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- El Salvador
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 47.2% against 39.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 7.7%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 10th and Malta ranks 8th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.1% | 13.4% | 0.7% | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 23.2% | 25.6% | 2.4% | Malta |
| 2010s | 35.4% | 42.0% | 6.6% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), El Salvador or Malta?
- Malta, at 47.2% against 39.5% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between El Salvador and Malta?
- 7.7%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malta?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Malta rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- El Salvador ranks 10th and Malta ranks 8th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.