Czechia vs SEAR: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Czechia
37.6%
in 2019
SEAR
13.3%
in 2019
Czechia rank
13th
SEAR rank
13th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Czechia
- SEAR
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 37.6% against 13.3% in SEAR, a difference of 24.3%.
That makes Czechia's figure about 2.8 times SEAR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 13th and SEAR ranks 13th of 193 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.1% | 2.6% | 7.5% | Czechia |
| 2000s | 21.1% | 5.7% | 15.4% | Czechia |
| 2010s | 32.9% | 10.7% | 22.2% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Czechia or SEAR?
- Czechia, at 37.6% against 13.3% in SEAR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Czechia and SEAR?
- 24.3%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and SEAR?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and SEAR rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Czechia ranks 13th and SEAR ranks 13th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.