Czechia vs Mauritius: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Czechia
37.6%
in 2019
Mauritius
35.4%
in 2019
Czechia rank
13th
Mauritius rank
16th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Czechia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 37.6% against 35.4% in Mauritius, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Czechia ranks 13th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 193 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.1% | 7.8% | 2.3% | Czechia |
| 2000s | 21.1% | 11.7% | 9.3% | Czechia |
| 2010s | 32.9% | 25.6% | 7.3% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Czechia or Mauritius?
- Czechia, at 37.6% against 35.4% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Czechia and Mauritius?
- 2.2%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mauritius?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Mauritius rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Czechia ranks 13th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.