Czechia vs EMR: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Czechia
37.6%
in 2019
EMR
14.7%
in 2019
Czechia rank
13th
EMR rank
10th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Czechia
- EMR
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 37.6% against 14.7% in EMR, a difference of 22.9%.
That makes Czechia's figure about 2.6 times EMR's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 13th and EMR ranks 10th of 193 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | EMR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.1% | 4.9% | 5.2% | Czechia |
| 2000s | 21.1% | 8.2% | 12.8% | Czechia |
| 2010s | 32.9% | 13.2% | 19.6% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Czechia or EMR?
- Czechia, at 37.6% against 14.7% in EMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Czechia and EMR?
- 22.9%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and EMR?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and EMR rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Czechia ranks 13th and EMR ranks 10th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.