Czechia vs El Salvador: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Czechia
37.6%
in 2019
El Salvador
39.5%
in 2019
Czechia rank
13th
El Salvador rank
10th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Czechia
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 39.5% against 37.6% in Czechia, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 13th and El Salvador ranks 10th of 193 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.1% | 14.1% | 4.0% | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 21.1% | 23.2% | 2.2% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 32.9% | 35.4% | 2.5% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Czechia or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 39.5% against 37.6% in Czechia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Czechia and El Salvador?
- 1.9%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and El Salvador?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and El Salvador rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Czechia ranks 13th and El Salvador ranks 10th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.