Costa Rica vs Iceland: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Costa Rica
50.3%
in 2019
Iceland
52.6%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
4th
Iceland rank
3rd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Costa Rica
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 52.6% against 50.3% in Costa Rica, a difference of 2.3%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 3rd of 193 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.4% | 14.9% | 3.5% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 21.0% | 31.8% | 10.8% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 41.2% | 48.5% | 7.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Costa Rica or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 52.6% against 50.3% in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Costa Rica and Iceland?
- 2.3%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Iceland?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Iceland rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Costa Rica ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 3rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.