Chile vs Nicaragua: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Chile
34.0%
in 2019
Nicaragua
34.1%
in 2019
Chile rank
21st
Nicaragua rank
19th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Chile
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 34.1% against 34.0% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Chile ranks 21st and Nicaragua ranks 19th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.6% | 11.1% | 1.6% | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 17.9% | 18.3% | 0.4% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 29.8% | 29.7% | 0.0% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Chile or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 34.1% against 34.0% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Chile and Nicaragua?
- 0.1%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nicaragua?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Nicaragua rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Chile ranks 21st and Nicaragua ranks 19th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.