Chile vs Cuba: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Chile
34.0%
in 2019
Cuba
33.9%
in 2019
Chile rank
21st
Cuba rank
23rd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Chile
- Cuba
How they compare
Chile currently reports 34.0% against 33.9% in Cuba, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Chile ranks 21st and Cuba ranks 23rd of 193 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.6% | 11.8% | 2.3% | Cuba |
| 2000s | 17.9% | 22.3% | 4.5% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 29.8% | 32.0% | 2.2% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Chile or Cuba?
- Chile, at 34.0% against 33.9% in Cuba as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Chile and Cuba?
- 0.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Cuba?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Cuba rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Chile ranks 21st and Cuba ranks 23rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.