Canada vs Sur: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Canada
62.4%
in 2019
Sur
21.0%
in 2019
Canada rank
1st
Sur rank
2nd
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Canada
- Sur
How they compare
Canada currently reports 62.4% against 21.0% in Sur, a difference of 41.4%.
That makes Canada's figure about 3.0 times Sur's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.5% | 7.2% | 11.3% | Canada |
| 2000s | 44.7% | 13.3% | 31.4% | Canada |
| 2010s | 61.3% | 19.4% | 41.9% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Canada or Sur?
- Canada, at 62.4% against 21.0% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Canada and Sur?
- 41.4%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Sur rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Canada ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.