Belgium vs El Salvador: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Belgium
40.0%
in 2019
El Salvador
39.5%
in 2019
Belgium rank
9th
El Salvador rank
10th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Belgium
- El Salvador
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 40.0% against 39.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.
Belgium ranks 9th and El Salvador ranks 10th of 193 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.8% | 14.1% | 0.7% | Belgium |
| 2000s | 28.0% | 23.2% | 4.8% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 37.9% | 35.4% | 2.5% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Belgium or El Salvador?
- Belgium, at 40.0% against 39.5% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Belgium and El Salvador?
- 0.5%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and El Salvador?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and El Salvador rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Belgium ranks 9th and El Salvador ranks 10th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.