Bahamas vs South Africa: Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Bahamas
22.5%
in 2019
South Africa
22.0%
in 2019
Bahamas rank
67th
South Africa rank
70th
Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Bahamas
- South Africa
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 22.5% against 22.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 67th and South Africa ranks 70th of 193 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8% | 5.5% | 2.3% | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 14.3% | 10.8% | 3.5% | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 20.7% | 18.4% | 2.3% | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Bahamas or South Africa?
- Bahamas, at 22.5% against 22.0% in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Bahamas and South Africa?
- 0.5%, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and South Africa?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and South Africa rank globally for hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Bahamas ranks 67th and South Africa ranks 70th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.